Joseph Ford Cotto is an American journalist, historian, and commentator known for his conservative and nationalist viewpoints. His works often reflect a skepticism towards international interventions and a preference for policies that prioritize American sovereignty and national interests.

Anti-Interventionist Views: Cotto's stance on foreign policy is characterized by a strong aversion to unnecessary military interventions and international entanglements that do not directly serve American interests. His perspective is shaped by a belief in maintaining national sovereignty and a cautious approach to foreign engagements.

1. Critique of U.S. Military Interventions: Cotto has been vocal in his criticism of U.S. military interventions abroad, arguing that many of these actions do not serve the national interest and instead lead to prolonged conflicts and instability. He believes that American resources should be focused on domestic issues rather than international policing.

2. Emphasis on National Sovereignty: A recurring theme in Cotto's writings is the importance of national sovereignty. He argues that international interventions often undermine the sovereignty of nations, including the United States. This principle extends to his views on immigration and international trade agreements, where he advocates for policies that protect American interests.

3. American Nationalism: Cotto's anti-interventionism is rooted in a broader framework of American nationalism. He views foreign policy through the lens of what is best for America, often criticizing policies that he believes compromise American values or expose the country to unnecessary risks.

4. Criticism of International Organizations: Cotto is also critical of international organizations and agreements that, in his view, diminish U.S. sovereignty. He questions the effectiveness and intentions of these organizations, advocating for a more independent and self-reliant approach to foreign policy.

Publications and Media: Cotto has written extensively on these topics, contributing to various conservative publications and platforms. His work often includes historical analyses and comparisons, providing context for his critiques of contemporary foreign policy.

Conclusion: While not a traditional antiwar activist, Joseph Ford Cotto's anti-interventionist views align with certain aspects of the antiwar movement. His focus on national sovereignty and skepticism towards foreign entanglements offer a unique perspective within the broader discourse on U.S. foreign policy.